<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPLv3: is anti-Tivoisation flawed?</title>
	<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2007/07/gplv3-is-anti-tivoisation-flawed/</link>
	<description>Distilling market noise into market sense.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Sweetman</title>
		<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2007/07/gplv3-is-anti-tivoisation-flawed/#comment-17803</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Sweetman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2007/07/gplv3-is-anti-tivoisation-flawed/#comment-17803</guid>
		<description>When I read GPLv3 I assumed that "ROM" in the anti-Tivoisation section was used literally to mean a 'read-only memory' -- a hard-coded chip.  Anything you can update over-the-air or otherwise is a writable chip.  Names like "PROM" and "EEPROM" are used for chips which require some special procedure to overwrite.  You're right that this clause in GPLv3 would be nonsense if "ROM" includes "EEPROM".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read GPLv3 I assumed that &#8220;ROM&#8221; in the anti-Tivoisation section was used literally to mean a &#8216;read-only memory&#8217; &#8212; a hard-coded chip.  Anything you can update over-the-air or otherwise is a writable chip.  Names like &#8220;PROM&#8221; and &#8220;EEPROM&#8221; are used for chips which require some special procedure to overwrite.  You&#8217;re right that this clause in GPLv3 would be nonsense if &#8220;ROM&#8221; includes &#8220;EEPROM&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2007/07/gplv3-is-anti-tivoisation-flawed/#comment-7711</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2007/07/gplv3-is-anti-tivoisation-flawed/#comment-7711</guid>
		<description>Hi I hope you can help me with this problem: I &lt;a href="www.internet-explorer-errors.com/index.php?k=internet+explorer+6,7" rel="nofollow"&gt;can't open internet explorer&lt;/a&gt; and my McAfee Virus protection and Personal Firewall seem to have been disabled on  System..........Help me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I hope you can help me with this problem: I <a href="www.internet-explorer-errors.com/index.php?k=internet+explorer+6,7" rel="nofollow">can&#8217;t open internet explorer</a> and my McAfee Virus protection and Personal Firewall seem to have been disabled on  System&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Help me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
