<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who will own the screen? an analysis of the Active Idle Screen market 2009-2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2009/07/who-will-own-the-screen-an-analysis-of-the-active-idle-screen-market-2009-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2009/07/who-will-own-the-screen-an-analysis-of-the-active-idle-screen-market-2009-2011/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=who-will-own-the-screen-an-analysis-of-the-active-idle-screen-market-2009-2011</link>
	<description>Distilling market noise into market sense.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Constantinou</title>
		<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2009/07/who-will-own-the-screen-an-analysis-of-the-active-idle-screen-market-2009-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-67031</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Constantinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/?p=946#comment-67031</guid>
		<description>Rene,

Thanks for the heads up. We weren&#039;t aware that i-wood is active in this area. Will contact you separately so that we can at least update this post.

Kais3rs0ze,

Good point about  apps which can host own mini-stores (I would argue this is true for both embedded and downloadable apps). I guess though the in-app-store is limited to the context of the app; e.g. RJDJ (virtual music app) hosts a store for musical instruments. A map app can host an app store for specialised maps, etc

Andreas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rene,</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up. We weren&#8217;t aware that i-wood is active in this area. Will contact you separately so that we can at least update this post.</p>
<p>Kais3rs0ze,</p>
<p>Good point about  apps which can host own mini-stores (I would argue this is true for both embedded and downloadable apps). I guess though the in-app-store is limited to the context of the app; e.g. RJDJ (virtual music app) hosts a store for musical instruments. A map app can host an app store for specialised maps, etc</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kais3rs0ze</title>
		<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2009/07/who-will-own-the-screen-an-analysis-of-the-active-idle-screen-market-2009-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-67030</link>
		<dc:creator>Kais3rs0ze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/?p=946#comment-67030</guid>
		<description>Andreas

A great read and great insight as usual!
I think we&#039;ll see more ISVs who get an embed using widgets/icons to link directly into their addon products and services. They have to to drive additonal revenue. But every embed should be architected that way now: if you go to all the trouble getting an embed, hook them straight into your *own* product/service store. I wrote about why ISVs should hate app stores here http://predictivetext.blogspot.com/. One reason is lack of discovery. But if you are embedded, you should know what addon products/sevices the user has and doesn&#039;t have and dynamically push the latter to the user either through idle screen real estate (I like your ideas on monetising that btw)  or via their own application: the ISVs application should be &quot;virtual store&quot; of addon widgets/icons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andreas</p>
<p>A great read and great insight as usual!<br />
I think we&#8217;ll see more ISVs who get an embed using widgets/icons to link directly into their addon products and services. They have to to drive additonal revenue. But every embed should be architected that way now: if you go to all the trouble getting an embed, hook them straight into your *own* product/service store. I wrote about why ISVs should hate app stores here <a href="http://predictivetext.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://predictivetext.blogspot.com/</a>. One reason is lack of discovery. But if you are embedded, you should know what addon products/sevices the user has and doesn&#8217;t have and dynamically push the latter to the user either through idle screen real estate (I like your ideas on monetising that btw)  or via their own application: the ISVs application should be &#8220;virtual store&#8221; of addon widgets/icons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rene kock</title>
		<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2009/07/who-will-own-the-screen-an-analysis-of-the-active-idle-screen-market-2009-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-66997</link>
		<dc:creator>rene kock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/?p=946#comment-66997</guid>
		<description>Good report. But they forgot us. 

i-wood, watch the demo.
Live since 2006 with several operators. 

Rene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good report. But they forgot us. </p>
<p>i-wood, watch the demo.<br />
Live since 2006 with several operators. </p>
<p>Rene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay Madhok</title>
		<link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2009/07/who-will-own-the-screen-an-analysis-of-the-active-idle-screen-market-2009-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-66991</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay Madhok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/?p=946#comment-66991</guid>
		<description>This is Super...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Super&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
