Augmented Economics: Making Money at the Edge of Reality

Andreas Constantinou 3,914 views
Vote This Post DownVote This Post Up +5 rating
 
Loading ... Loading ...

[There's lots more than meets the eye in augmented reality. Research Director, Andreas Constantinou talks about Augmented Economics, a new form of economy where value is created by superimposing virtual value on top of our physical world]

augmented-economics

Economics is an area of continuous research, both academic and industrial. Once in a while, new revenue models or new markets surface, which are followed by a string of industry capital movements. Take for example new revenue models being pioneered in the Internet like the cost-per-follower (ie being paid based on how many people are following you on twitter) or in the mobile domain (pay-per-app-activation when B2B provisioning applications on a device). New markets are continually formed around new solution types; in the fast-moving mobile industry for example, App Stores,  Social Addressbooks and Service Analytics are  new solution markets which emerged only in the last two years.

What’s more interesting is when entire new economies emerge, ie new systems for creating value and monetising from that value. I would argue that in the last few years we have been witnessing the creation of Augmented Economics, ie the economy formed by superimposing value on top of our physical world. But let me take a step back to explain.

There’s been a lot of buzz recently around augmented reality browsers. These browsers bring augmented reality to the mass market; now you can scan through the surroundings through your phone’s camera and see information superimposed, from advertising to siteseeing in real time. Augmented reality browsers have been made possible in a mass market sense thanks to the GPS and compass sensors  first appearing within Android and iPhone devices. The value in augmented reality browsing is in the connection between the physical world (what the camera captures) and the commercial information that is displayed on top. Already a number of startups have emerged to capture value in augmented reality browsers like Metaio, Total Immersion, Zugara, Layar, Mobilizy and Tonchidot (see here for a detailed review of augmented reality startups)

In a sense, Facebook is no different. Facebook is a platform that overlays virtual games and applications on top of the people profiles and mesh of relationships that exist in the physical world. Facebook is indeed a connecting platform between the physical world and 1000s of virtual worlds created by third parties. Facebook monetises through on-site ads for now, and moving to off-site ads, self-service ads and virtual goods which is expected to increase ARPU (average revenue per user) from $0.25 to $0.50 according to Fred Wilson, a prominent VC.

Flirtomatic, a popular mobile dating service in the UK, Germany and USA, monetises by offering social capital for sale. Flirtomatic allows users to buy social capital; users can send virtual ice cubes, auction themselves to the top of the service homepage, or even buy Ego services so they can eliminate bad ratings on their profile or bend the voting rules (see here for a good review of the service by Tomi Ahonen). Flirtomatic again monetises by bonding together the physical world with the virtual world where users can defy physics.

There’s lots more examples.
- Monopoly City Streets creates capital by allow users to buy virtual real-estate (viewable only through your browser) in exchange for real money.

- Cyworld, Everquest, World of Warcraft and Second Life are virtual worlds which monetise by subscriptions, virtual goods, virtual currency exchanges and ads by physical world brands. Fortune reported that the market in China for virtual goods is larger than the market for online advertising with Tencent, China’s largest messaging+Avatar+social networking service, generating $1 billion  in revenues in 2008, 90% of which is from virtual goods, as cited in the Business Model Database.

- A barcode (or QR Code, Data Matrix and Ezcode)  allows a mobile device to connect a physical product in a store or a poster in the train station to a wealth of online information, such as where the product ingredients came from, or when is the next train (the Economist has a good update on the commercialisation of 2D codes). Again monetisation is by providing the connection between physical and virtual worlds.

- Anoto, a Swedish company, produces technology to connect a digital pen with the origin of the paper that it’s writing on. For example, by writing on a business card, you can send that to the contact directly, or by writing on a recruitment form, you can have your job application dispatched immediately. Anoto monetises by acting as the link between the physical world (pen and paper) and the virtual world (that of service providers of business information, recruiters, etc).

There’s probably lots more examples where companies have formed connections between the physical world and countless virtual worlds. And as Clayton Christensen et al argue in Skate to Where the Money Will Be, those who control the interdependent links in a value chain capture the most profit. In other words, the platform that links the physical with the virtual worlds stands to profit the most.

It’s amazing how value can be created out of thin air.. in this case creating social capital that allows users to ‘augment’ the physics of the real world (time, money or influence). And as S Schaffer said the next Google might be a physical world connection company. That’s the world of Augmented Economics.

Looking forward to your comments,

- Andreas
follow me on Twitter: @andreascon

18Sep2009
Gary Hayes

Nice item Andreas,

You may find my article “16 Top Augmented Reality Business Models” a useful supplement to your intro?

http://www.personalizemedia.com/16-top-augmented-reality-business-models/

Best Gary

 
19Sep
Ivan Walsh

Hello,

Very well written article.

I’d also add that here in China companies such as The9 and Sohu are also finding ways to generate revenues from virtual games.

One difference v the West is that they rely very little on advertising and focus on upselling virtual goods, esp goods the improve a user’s social status.

For example, during holiday periods game players will bling up their avatars to demonstrate their social status, albeit online.

Something that’s also catching on here is ‘renting’ virtual goods such as backgrounds and decorations.

They rent these for limited time periods and then pony up for the real thing or try another item.

Other companies let you trade back items, though at a reduced value.

Regards,

Ivan Walsh

http://www.ivanwalsh.com at The Virtual Currency Report

 
20Sep
Magnus Ingelsten

Indeed an interesting article Andreas.
New money being realized with old technologies, that have found it´s value through new applications and services. Latest from MNO 3 in Sweden, a family subscription including mobile where all family members can follow each others geographical position on a map on the screen. (not sure my daughter ant that switched on on hers, though…)

I think also company wikis with blogs , all the news and more will make way into mobiles, but still require openness in allowing any content be posted by workers and colleagues. We are not there yet with the openness.

Br, Magnus
http://whatsyourideaoftomorrow.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/TelecaMobile

 
21Sep
Brad Cho

Good article and helpful resources, Andreas

About 3 years ago I thought Mobile RFID (or NFC?) can be a next generation ‘Offline / Physical Hypertext to Online’ in the future.

But RFID technology now find its way on the Supply Chain Management, not mobile service in Korea.

That’s why the ownership of RFID chip cost is ambiguous and RFID-reader embedded phone is not widly spread yet.

The service cases of combined camera phone and augement reality shows the edge of next generation service, I think.

Output type: Multi-layered, Input type: Multi-modal.
About it we will need more shiny ideas as well as technology.

Brad Cho

http://www.visionarena.net

 
22Sep
Eric Woods

We (www.MindSpaceSolutions.com) recently completed our (3D stereoscopic, coin-operated) Digital Binocular Station platform (www.DigitalBinocularStation.com) for use in cultural and tourism locations. It is essentially an Augmented Reality device, but because it is fixed to a single location, we have been able to use photorealistic, cinema-quality visuals, and compensate for the lack of parallax by presenting everything in stereoscopic 3D. This essentially uses the business model of the traditional binocular station (pay per view), but instead of offering magnification, it offers a unique experience, or as Andreas puts it, can ‘Augment Time’ – allowing you to go back in time, or replay a perfect moment ad infinitum.

While we have done traditional end-user and installation-based Augmented Reality in the past (www.GetImaginality.com, which uses an iTunes-like business model) this use-case demanded a different approach that could be highly robust and secure, very easy to use, no staff overheads, small space requirements and complex visuals.

Currently, this approach is not possible to the same degree in mobile handsets, but I am sure a day will come when it is. However, it will require a different business model and considerably more customer awareness/education. In my opinion, this is a larger challenge than the technology in many situations.

New Zealand TV1’s NZI Business recently ran the peice on our Digital Binocular Station at the Canterbury Museum. It is available to view at http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/nzi-business-november-10-mindspace-takes-interactive-learning-next-level-2-40-3123877

Video, images and more info are at http://www.DigitalBinocularStation.com

 
19Nov